Facebook
Let’s face it, Facebook could’ve done a better job at a few things:
- By default, upon sign up, make each user’s privacy settings the most private they can be. This shows them that you are there for them to enjoy your site, putting their safety first.
- Make detailed information about the risks involved in posting ANY content on a social network WAY more prominent.
- Explain in very very simple terms with videos/flash animations what it means to allow applications to access your content, what those applications might use your content for, and how you can keep it blocked if you so choose.
- Make a security/privacy video required viewing before they’re even allowed to create their account.
I agree that Facebook’s popularity exploded faster than it’s inexperienced college student of a leader could even fathom. His inexperience with owning/operating a real business and being accountable to those people called “customers” shined right on through and bit him right in the ass. I almost feel bad for him….almost….but not quite.
This whole privacy issue that happened has created legitimate concerns that absolutely need to be addressed, however, it has also unearthed a reminder about human behavior and it’s common and lazy aversion to personal responsibility online.
Just Because You Like It, Doesn’t Mean You Should Trust It
Here’s a news flash for ya: All online activity is logged. Even though some of the logged content is logged privately somewhere inside a network like Facebook, or Gmail, there’s ALWAYS the chance, that someone who does have access to that email, that IM conversation, that private tweet, that private message/convo on Facebook can dump that data somewhere and share it with whoever they want for any amount of money or just for the sake of being an asshole. That’s the most extreme version of course but I’m trying to make a point that newer generations are putting too much trust in the cloud, too much trust that the tangible things that mean the most to them are to be trusted in such an intangible environment (electrical impulses and 1′s and 0′s).
My recommendation is that if you really care about your online social privacy, if you really care about who sees what content that is yours and when, then only upload or post stuff that is not personal. Millions of people are trusting their most personal content to one of the most impersonal environments in existence, a social network. A social network is meant to be just that: social. The allure and culture of a social network is to share and be shared with, to feed and to be fed (personal experiences via data), and this is to happen openly and by design.
If you don’t want people to see certain things that you consider ‘private’, things that could provide an opportunity for companies or others to exploit blatantly or subversively, then don’t upload it, don’t post it, don’t share it. Plain and simple.
Nothing is more annoying to me than online users getting mad at the baker just because they got caught with their hands in the cookie jar.
Onward.















The Self-Authorization of Our Own Digital Cloning
One almost humorous observation I’ve made is that the same people who complain or are fearful of this are the same ones that are also contributing to it, whether they realize it, like it, hate it, or not. Every time you update your status about what you had for dinner, your struggles as a parent, how much you like your job, when you last went to Disneyland and how fun it was, etc. – algorithms collect, organize and attempt to construct a ‘virtual you’ over time period that can be stored in a multitude of ways, deconstructed by ad agencies and reconstructed as needed to serve you content that they hope will be as close to your heart strings as possible. Because you have provided the data about yourself from your own brain and fingertips, this content statistically has a higher and higher percent chance of resonating with you as time goes on after they measure your continued responses. As we continue to voluntarily provide more insight into our likes, dislikes and fears. We are constructing a virtual version or copy of humanity in the form of patterns that fill up a multitude of databases. Unless you are in high-tech, this happens without the majority of us even realizing it because we are distracted by our own emotions and the day to day stresses of life and onslaught of news feeds that now pour in from every direction. We also aren’t taught to think about the web that way.
I’m sure I sound like a whack job (and to some extent I am) but a simpler way to describe it is this (I’m sure most of you have seen this before): When you see a new animated movie come out like Avatar, their goal is to as accurately as possible, recreate realistic human physical motion and movement so that the characters look as authentic as possible and are believable. In a production studio, they do so by making the actors wear a body suit covered in sensors that connect up to a computer program. They then have the actor do certain movements for the movie to support various scenes, etc. While they are moving around, the sensors are recording these movements and it creates a 3D image of those movements on the screen, completing a virtual version of that person and their physical/movement characteristics. The social monopolization of the web is doing the exact same thing except it’s with human behavior on a global scale. By creating an account on a social network or site so that we can willingly populate it with content from our daily lives and true selves, we have officially authorized the creation of digital clones of us as a species by companies so that it can be utilized for business and science.
Fortunately, computers aren’t capable of creating emotion via chemicals and hormones by the nanosecond like we are so ‘rise of the machines’ ain’t happening anytime soon….but hey, it’s fascinating shit.
Onward.